One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

Question

10-09-2017
Social Studies

contestada

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Which of the following describes the BEST method for keeping the endocrine system healthy? A. exercise regularly B. eat a healthy and balance diet C. manage st

Sometimes a short paragraph will be needed as a transition to achieve coherence in a research paper.

solve for 2cos^2theta + 13costheta = -6. theta is >= 0 and < 360 degrees

The outcome of the US presidential election in 2000 was determined by the popular vote. the Electoral College. the Florida Supreme Court.

In 1819 and 1824, the rulings of the Supreme Court during the “Era of Good Feeling” established the power of the national government over the ___________ govern

Which sentence contains an antonym for confirmed? A. The cold affected their performance. B. He arranged the details for the sale of the yacht. C. She disreg

Were most of the American immigrants before the Revolutionary War Italian?

The most basic purpose of reading is A. education. B. getting information. C. providing entertainment. D. acquiring insight.

Find the product and simplify your answer -8w(6w^5-5w+5)

SeoJoon15 SeoJoon15 · Answer 1 · 2017-09-21T05:15:59+02:00

SeoJoon15 SeoJoon15

21-09-2017

The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.

Answer Link